| Title | [Appropriateness of ketorolac use in a trauma hospital.] | | Author(s) | Angeles González-Fernández M | | Institution | Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, España. | | Source | Rev Calid Asist 2009 Jun; 24(3):115-23. | | Abstract | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the suitability of ketorolac and non-steroidal anti-inflamatory drugs (NSAIDs) and other analgesic drugs currently used in the hospital. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: We have followed the steps to develop a PDCA cycle (plan, do, check, act) or quality improvement cycle. The quality problem was analysed using an Ishikawa diagram. We defined both qualitative quality indicators, those that measure prescription quality, and quantitative ones (defined daily dose, DDD/100BDs), which measure drug consumption, being the objectives to achieve. The study was conducted in all patients admitted to the hospital and who were admitted to orthopaedic and trauma surgery and plastic surgery departments with unit-dose dispensing systems. The strategy used was to give information to physicians through meetings and documentation. Finally, the results were analysed and compared with the initial objectives.
RESULTS: The study was performed on 260 patients in the first study period and 292 in the second. Qualitative indicators: intravenous ketorolac use</=2 days, increased in 25.5% (p<0.001); in patients>/=65 years old at dose</=60mg/day it increased 27.7% (p<0.05). Quantitative indicators: in the second study period, ketorolac use decreased (plastic surgery department: 61.8 DDD/100BDs to 14.8), whereas tramadol, ibuprofen and metamizole increased (plastic surgery department: 0 to 14.1 in tramadol, 8.7 to 48.6 in ibuprofen and 50.1 to 71 in metamizole).
CONCLUSIONS: Appropriateness of ketorolac, NSAIDs and tramadol use has been achieved, thus improving patient safety. Strategies have been effective. | | Language | spa | | Pub Type(s) | English Abstract
Journal Article
| | PubMed ID | 19564004 |
|
